PNAs (blockers for mitochondrial and chloroplast amplification)
- More organelles were filtered from the leaves than the roots, sediment, or water.
average % loss by sample type | |
Leaf | 26.5518607264 |
Root | 10.6381529905 |
Sediment | 5.1730348426 |
Water | 13.0591363787 |
- using PNAs did not result in an overall loss of reads
# filtered reads | |
PNA | 389011 |
no PNA | 411059 |
- in progress: do we see more chimeras with PNA use?
Run summary statistics
- 533 samples, including kit controls and PNA tests
- reads per sample (after filtration) ranged from 5 – 206,661
- the kit control with the most reads had 6549
- 306 (57.4%) of the samples had fewer than 6549 reads, we’ll call these low-abundance samples
- breakdown of low-abundance samples by type
Leaf | Water | Roots | Sediment |
126 (41.1%) | 109 (35.6%) | 32 (8.8%) | 33 (10.8%) |
- in progress: not sure, I published this post by accident